Subscribe in a reader

Rechercher dans ce blog

PAGES

Pages vues depuis décembre 2009

Affichage des articles dont le libellé est astrophysics. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est astrophysics. Afficher tous les articles

mercredi 14 décembre 2016

How crazy Vera Rubin re-invented the delirium Dark Matter to stay on East Coast

by Yanick Toutain
REVACTU
December 14, 2016

...I came out with sets of numbers and I plotted the more pieces of paper
and I discovered that the stars as you went further and further out
did not slow down.
They were moving just as fast as the stars near the center.
And then a surprise that had to be explained. "
from Newton's law,
it was expected that the velocities of the stars
 would fall off.
So it was clear that our ideas about galaxies were incorrect."
Vera Rubin


Where we discover that a crazy woman, not to go to California used her ignorance and instrumentalized her idleness to re-invent a madness: an invisible matter that attracts the stars of peripheries but ..... do not diminish their centripetal acceleration: the mysterious dark matter
"When I started working here I looked for a problem that i could do at my own pace. I had four children and a supportive husband but traveling was more difficult to go two observatories out west which was necessary.
... If we plot the velocity of the planets as a function of distance from the Sun Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto and you can see that Mercury orbits much more rapidly and..

This fool forgets to say (to verify) that if 50 suns were in the orbit of Jupiter, the velocity of Pluto would be greater than that of Mercury
... I picked the outsides of galaxies because that was the problem that no one that I know of is studying and it was problem that i have been interested in for quite a while.
It was mainly because her ignorance was going to give her a varnish of celebrity at low cost among the obscurantists who have the power
...I came out with sets of numbers and I plotted the more pieces of paper and I discovered that the stars as you went further and further out did not slow down. They were moving just as fast as the stars near the center. And then a surprise that had to be explained.
It is enough to think to understand that the peripheral stars undergo the maximum of centripetal acceleration.
And that therefore their velocity is proportional to the square root of the TOTALITY of the centripetal acceleration of the TOTALITY of the stars
... If we observe the velocities of stars orbiting in the galaxy we find that their velocities remain flat all the way to the edge of our observations. That's not what was expected by correspondence with the solar system. And in fact just from Newton's law, it was expected that the velocities of the stars would fall off. So it was clear that our ideas about galaxies were incorrect."
This madwoman has not checked anything and reinvented a delirium: the BLACK MATTER of the crazy Zwicky

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx THE ASYLUM IS SUPPORTED BY THE BBC




COMPLETE VERBATIM (with some mistakes)



The world was not yet ready for Peebles and Ostriker, and their ideas of dark matter. But things were about to change, thanks to Vera Rubin at the Cornegie Institute. Vera Rubin has spent decades solving the mysteries of the universe. She said,

"Wwhen I started working here I looked for a problem that i could do at my own pace. I had four children and a supportive husband but traveling was more difficult to go two observatories out west which was necessary.

The other decided to ignore the sexy science of black holes which was very big at the time and look instead of entire galaxies. By doing so she stumbled across something much more fundamental.
For 300 years, Newton's law of gravity has defined our understanding of the universe.
Gravity governs everything from falling apples to the air and flow of the tides. But fully understand scientists had to look beyond planet Earth. Gravity's mysterious part is clearest in the solar system where the Sun holds the orbiting planets in its gravitational grip

VR "If we plot the velocity of the planets as a function of distance from the Sun Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto and you can see that Mercury orbits much more rapidly and...

MUSIC
The graph is called a rotation curve it is the embodiment of the law of gravity. The further away you travel from the Sun, the weaker its gravitational force.
Galaxies work in the same way as our solar system except that instead of planets orbiting a central Sun, in a spiral galaxies stars are held in orbit by a gravity providing black hole.
In the nineteen seventies Vera's family-friendly project was looking for rotation curves in galaxies.

VR "I picked the outsides of galaxies because that was the problem that no one that I know of is studying and it was problem that i have been interested in for quite a while"

Via turned her telescopes on Andromeda galaxy closest to our own

VR " I came out with sets of numbers and I plotted the more pieces of paper and i discovered that the stars as you went further and further out did not slow down. They were moving just as fast as the stars near the center. And then a surprise that had to be explained. "

The stars seem to defy the laws of gravity the expected rotation curves weren't codes at all.

VR "If we observe the velocities of stars orbiting in the galaxy we find that their velocities remain flat all the way to the edge of our observations. That's not what was expected by correspondence with the solar system. And in fact just from Newton's law, it was expected that the velocities of the stars would fall off. So it was clear that our ideas about galaxies were incorrect."

The stars were moving too fast by rights they should simply fly off into space. It was as though they were being held in place by extra gravity and as luck would have it down the road at Princeton there was just the right amount of dark matter to provide just the right amount of extra gravity. It was a match made in heaven

lundi 5 décembre 2016

Vera Rubin's Dark Matter is a hoax ! Since 2012 I wait for Stacy Mc Gaugh post me his answer! He prefers to believe in the lucubrations of Vera Rubin and Mordehai Milgrom



by Yanick Toutain
REVACTU
December 5, 2012


READ

MERCREDI 14 DÉCEMBRE 2016

I have been patient since April 14, 2012 that Stacy Mc Gaugh answers me: whether or not he verified the statements of Vera Rubin?
Does Newton's laws prohibit high velocities for the peripheral stars of galaxies?
Did or not he verify that Mordehai Milgrom's lucubrations were useless to explain that the centripetal acceleration was maximum for stars farthest from the center of galaxies?
He never deigned to reply!
As Isaac Newton did not have the right qualifications either, he probably would not have answered either.
Too bad!
Especially since his complement to the discoveries of Tully-Fisher have placed him among the greatest discoverers of facts of recent decades.


Je patiente depuis le 14 avril 2012 que Stacy Mc Gaugh me réponde : est-ce que oui ou non il a vérifié les affirmations de Vera Rubin ?
Est-ce que oui ou non il pense toujours que les lois de Newton interdisent des vitesses élevées pour les étoiles périphériques des galaxies ?
Est-ce que oui ou non il a vérifié que les élucubrations de Mordehai Milgrom étaient inutiles pour expliquer que l'accélération centripète était maximale pour les étoiles les plus éloignées du centre des galaxies ?
Il n'a jamais daigné répondre !
Comme Isaac Newton n'avait pas - lui non plus - les bons diplômes, il ne lui aurait sans doute pas répondu non plus.
C'est dommage !
D'autant plus que son complément aux découvertes de Tully-Fisher l'ont placé parmi les plus grands découvreurs de faits des récentes décennies.


MY 2012 POST TO STACY MC GAUGH



Isaac Newton VS Fritz Zwicky-Vera Rubin (EN) No dark matter 2012 03 30 first video test

dimanche 17 novembre 2013

Looking at Venus tonight , I think " We're going over there ! We move in this direction. An absolute path. "

by Yanick Toutain

With a little luck tonight, it will be possible to watch - no clouds - Venus located BEFORE the Earth ( with a very high probability ) .
Indeed, the planet Venus passes close to the image of the star Ain al Rami (v1 and v2 Sgr ) ( Nu ¹ Sagittarii ( Nu ¹ Sgr ν ¹ Sagittarii , ν ¹ Sgr ) is a triple star system lying Approximately 1,850 light years from earth . )
However, this star has a special status in materialistic science ( néonewtoniste ) . It shows (most likely ) our ABSOLUTE DIRECTION.
If this night you point the finger to the south , then to Venus ( a very bright planet having the appearance of a star) you show the direction towards which the Earth, Venus, Ain al Rami and even the Galaxy " Milky Way" they all travel .
This is the conclusion of the Ain al Rami hypothesis.

In the vocabulary of Isaac Newton, the absolute place the star Ain Al Rami is currently will be occupied by the Sun and its planets in 1853 multiplied by 60 years.
Indeed, the Ain al Rami hypothesis also considers that our top speed is 1 /60 ° of the speed of light .
It considers that the aphelion point is a pure optical illusion due to the passage of the Earth BEFORE the Sun. This hypothesis considers that the reduction of 1/60 of the apparent diameter of the Sun, July 3, is simply the fact that the sun's rays have their travel increased by 1/60 of the Sun-Earth distance.
It is this assumption (which rejects the idea of an Earth Sun distance would be increased by 1/60 on July 3), which allows us to suppose (with high probability) that this night, Venus is BEFORE us .



En regardant Venus ce soir, je pense "Nous allons par-là ! Nous nous déplaçons dans cette direction. Une trajectoire absolue."

Avec un peu de chance, cette nuit, il sera possible de regarder - sans nuages - Venus se trouvant  DEVANT la Terre (avec une très grande probabilité).
En effet, la planète Vénus passe à proximité de l'image de l'étoile Ain Al Rami (v1 et v2 Sgr) (Nu¹ Sagittarii (Nu¹ Sgr, ν¹ Sagittarii, ν¹ Sgr) is a triple star system lying approximately 1850 light years from Earth.)
Or, cette étoile a un statut particulier en science matérialiste (néonewtoniste). Elle indique (fort probablement) notre DIRECTION ABSOLUE.
Si, cette nuit, vous montrez du doigt la direction du Sud, puis celle de Venus (une planète très lumineuse ayant l'apparence d'une étoile) vous montrez la direction vers laquelle se dirige, la Terre, Venus, Ain Al Rami et même toute la Galaxie "Voie Lactée".
C'est la conclusion de l'hypothèse Ain Al Rami.
Dans le vocabulaire d'Isaac Newton, le lieu absolu que l'étoile Ain Al Rami occcupe sera occupée par le Soleil et ses planètes dans 1853 fois 60 années.
En effet, l'hypothèse Ain Al Rami considère aussi que notre vitesse absolue est égale à 1/60° de la vitesse de la lumière.
Elle considère que le point d'aphélie est une pure illusion optique lié au passage de la Terre DEVANT le Soleil. Cette hypothèse considère que la diminution de 1/60 du diamètre apparent du Soleil, le 3 juillet, est simplement du au fait que les rayons du Soleil ont un trajet augmenté de 1/60 de la distance Soleil-Terre.
C'est donc cette hypothèse (qui refuse l'idée d'une distance Terre Soleil augmentée de 1/60 le 3 juillet) qui nous permet de suppposer (avec de grandes probabilités) que, cette nuit, Venus se trouve DEVANT nous.